Case Studies
This page contains three case studies that explore AQC’s deployment of air quality (AQ) sensors across San Francisco, Oakland, and South San Francisco, showcasing efforts to address environmental justice and air quality concerns in underserved communities. Led by Brightline Defense, Sequoia Foundation, and supported by Rise South City, these initiatives aimed to monitor localized air pollution through strategic partnerships and the use of scientific-grade air monitors, specifically Clarity Node-S sensors for monitoring PM2.5 and NO2. This project was funded through US EPA’s Enhanced Air Quality Monitoring for Communities grant.
​​​
In San Francisco, Brightline Defense focused on neighborhoods disproportionately impacted by pollution, such as the Tenderloin, SoMa, Bayview-Hunters Point, and Chinatown, installing sensors to provide real-time data on PM2.5 and NO2. In Oakland, Sequoia Foundation collaborated with the Oakland Unified School District to build a district-wide air monitoring network, integrating environmental health education while overcoming funding and logistical challenges.
​
In South San Francisco, Brightline Defense and Sequoia Foundation worked with Rise South City to deploy monitors, revealing key insights into the complexities of permissions, logistics, and technical calibration. Social considerations were significant, with delays stemming from the need to build relationships with government agencies and school districts for approval. Logistical and technical constraints further influenced the project timeline and data availability during training sessions
When identifying where monitors would be installed, we considered 1) community-identified locations, 2) monitor security, 3) impediments to accurate data collection, 4) site access and feasibility, 5) spatial coverage and proximity to traffic and other polluters. While community input on monitor location is integral to siting, factors, including the ability to access and secure air monitors rendered some locations infeasible. Monitors needed to be protected from both environmental impacts and vandalism, and placed in areas where coverage wasn’t limited by surrounding structures. Installation sites had to be approved by property owners and administrators, and had to be physically accessible and appropriate for installation.
​
These case studies highlight the importance of proactive communication, streamlined calibration, and adaptive planning to establish effective community AQ monitoring networks. Detailed insights from each region are outlined below, offering practical lessons for future air monitoring projects.

San Francisco
​​The San Francisco program was implemented by Brightline Defense, an environmental justice nonprofit providing direct services and supporting policy advocacy for Eastern San Francisco. Founded in 2006, Brightline has a deep history working on environmental justice issues, including job training, air quality, and clean energy advocacy in coalition with community organizations, government agencies, and community leaders.
​
For years, San Francisco residents and community groups have been concerned with poor air quality, especially in neighborhoods lined by highways, congested intersections, and industrial sites. Residents in the Eastern San Francisco communities of the Tenderloin, South of Market (SoMa), Bayview Hunters Point, and Chinatown were previously unmonitored at a neighborhood level for poor air quality, while being disproportionately burdened with pollution during poor air quality events.
Community Air Quality Concerns
-
Proximity highway traffic
-
Congested roadways
-
High concentration of industrial sites
​
In 2020, to address community concerns and better characterize the air pollution, Brightline teamed up with Clarity Monitoring Inc. to install 19 Clarity Node-S sensors in Bayview-Hunters Point, SoMa, the Tenderloin, and Chinatown to deliver community-level air quality readings for frontline communities.
​
After 5 years of monitoring, Brightline re-deployed its air quality monitoring network to include Black Carbon, a contaminant associated with heavy-duty truck traffic. Brightline then consolidated its network to 10 Clarity Node-S and AethLabs Black Carbon Monitors. As for the location of the sensors, Brightline chose to keep the sites relatively near the 2020 deployment locations, with some changes to address new community concerns and monitor safety. Here’s what we learned from the re-deployment:
​
Program Challenges
-
Technical limitations — air monitors limited to PM2.5 and NO2, which did not cover community concerns
-
Limited, inconsistent, short-term grant-based funding which impacts the ability to maintain air monitoring subscriptions
-
Community skepticism due to historic inaction on air quality concerns
-
Low participation of community members
​
When establishing community air quality monitoring networks, selecting the appropriate air quality sensor that aligns with the community’s pollution issues is essential. AQCBA opted for Clarity Node-S sensors due to their affordability, reliability, and ease of installation. However, these sensors are limited to monitoring PM2.5 and NO2, which restricts our ability to fully assess the air pollution concerns raised by community members. While the data they provide is valuable and free, it does not help us identify pollution sources, a common limitation in community air quality monitoring.
​
Limited or short-term funding can also constrain air quality monitoring projects. The monitoring duration is crucial for generating quality assessments of air quality data within each region. Consequently, obtaining long-term grant-based funding to extend monitor usage beyond 12 months will not only enhance community confidence in the network but also serve as a trustworthy data source.
​
Community participation in these projects thrives, and would likely increase further if community members received stipends for their contributions. Rise South City successfully leveraged gift cards for their second needs assessment workshop, resulting in high attendance, particularly from families who might not have been able to attend otherwise. Future funding considerations should include community stipends as a significant resource to further engage community members.
​​
Recommendations
-
Secure funding for community stipends to incentivize participation
-
Capitalize on existing community partnerships to support outreach and implementation
-
Co-develop and deploy sensors with community leaders who know the area best and may support outreach, building trust in the community, and providing alternatives for siting
-
Co-develop a draft site-deployment plan with air quality data analysts or academic institutions to gather recommendations on optimal siting, and ensure quality data will be collected
-
Create a game plan for deployment, including testing equipment beforehand, assembling any tools necessary for installation, and contacting the appropriate organizations for access to buildings/ rooftops, etc.

Oakland
​The Oakland program was implemented by Sequoia Foundation, a public health nonprofit that collaborates with government agencies and community-based organizations to bridge the gap between research and community. Sequoia Foundation has worked with Bay Area School Districts for over five years, and has leveraged other partnerships with grassroots organizations in the East Bay to effectively engage youth in environmental public health education. Sequoia Foundation has developed training workshops for teachers to help them develop meaningful air quality curricula and works with district students and teachers both inside and outside the classroom to increase knowledge and awareness of environmental impacts on their broader communities.
​
Sequoia has partnered with the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) to develop an air monitoring network at Oakland schools. OUSD encompasses a diverse student population that faces a number of psycho-social stressors including poverty and violence, high crime, and unemployment, in addition to physical ailments from hyper-localized exposures to pollutants, both indoor and outdoor. Residents living in East and West Oakland face drastically higher levels of exposure to pollutants than their counterparts in other areas due to proximity to roads and industry, and regional geographical attributes.
Working with OUSD allows teachers and students to access real-time, local data in the classroom to help visualize and characterize air quality in their communities. Sequoia partnered with Clarity Movement, installing over 40 Clarity Node-S sensors across the school district throughout the Fall of 2024, including 10 provided through Collaborative funding.
​​​
Community Air Quality Concerns
-
Proximity to highway traffic
-
Congested roadways
-
Proximity to industry
​​
Implementing a successful monitoring program within District schools presents several challenges, particularly under short timelines that necessitate rapid partnership development to secure approvals and access to diverse monitoring sites. Variability in school requirements, procedures, and infrastructure further complicates the process, alongside limited guidance on equipment protocols such as charging, siting, and installation. Additionally, ensuring data accuracy requires enhanced quality control measures, especially given the limited experience and capacity of youth interns involved in the siting process.
​
Program Challenges
-
Short timelines requiring developing new partnerships quickly to secure approval for and access to preferable/diverse monitoring sites
-
Inconsistent requirements, procedures, preferences, and architecture, across District schools
-
Limited guidance on equipment protocol, including as charging, siting, and installation requirements necessary to ensure accurate data collection
-
Need for increased quality control assurance due to limited experience and capacity of youth interns assisting with the citing process
​
Recommendations
-
Leverage preexisting relationships with District administration and establish new relationships to ensure that protocols and practices align with District requirements and priorities
-
Coordinate with District staff to streamline communications with school principals and District administration
- Utilize solar-powered monitors that connect via cellular networks to bypass potential issues with unreliable wifi networks
- When the total number of monitors exceeds 10 monitors, break up installation into smaller groups of monitors to ensure protocols are followed and allow adequate time for quality control

South San Francisco
​The South San Francisco program was implemented jointly by Brightline Defense and Sequoia Foundation, to support the environmental justice organization Rise South City. South San Francisco has a history of poor air quality issues, due to the city’s close proximity to San Francisco Airport, active construction and industrial sites, and highways 101 and 280.
​
Community Air Quality Concerns
-
Proximity to highway traffic
-
Active construction and industrial sites
-
Close proximity to SFO
-
Congested roadways
​
From October to December 2024, AQC staff deployed 15 Clarity Node-S sensors in the neighborhoods of San Bruno and South San Francisco. These were locations initially identified by community leaders in both cities, that AQC staff then visited and verified to monitor safety and quality readings.
​
In this region, AQC tried a mixed approach to deploying the sensors, by dividing up the 15 between 3 different sectors: parks and rec, schools, and community homes. The intention was to capture the air quality in sites close to parks (open, green spaces), at schools (where students spend a great amount of time and may be most at risk for certain air quality health illnesses), and community homes to truly understand what the average community member may be inhaling daily at home.
​
In coordinating and deploying 15 monitors in South San Francisco and San Bruno, Brightline and Sequoia staff encountered a number of obstacles and challenges. Here’s what we learned:
​
Program Challenges
-
Significant delays in approvals from government agencies, impacting installation and training
-
No preexisting relationships with local government agencies or school districts further delayed deployment
- Global calibration does not allow for quality control procedures prior to installation
- Some monitoring sites my have insufficient sunlight to adequately charge the monitors
​​
The deployment of monitoring equipment faced significant challenges, including delays in approvals from South San Francisco Parks and Recreation that impacted installation and training timelines. The lack of preexisting relationships with South San Francisco Parks and Recreation and School Districts, including South San Francisco Unified School District and San Bruno Unified School District, further prolonged the process.
Additionally, the reliance on global calibration limited quality control procedures before installation, while some monitoring sites presented issues with insufficient sunlight, affecting the ability to adequately charge the monitors
​
Recommendations
-
Develop resources for partners that address common, anticipated concerns about the monitors and collected data
-
Co-develop and deploy sensors with community leaders who know the area best and may support in contacting people, building trust in the community, and providing alternatives
- Utilize global air monitoring calibration options when standard calibration of individual monitors is infeasible
- Establish relationships with government partners (e.g., Parks and Recreation) and/or school districts prior to deployment stage of project to anticipate delays in approval process​
